Immigrants’ Rights

The fundamental constitutional protections of due process and equal protection embodied in our Constitution and Bill of Rights apply to every person and are not limited to citizens.

Graphic of a monarch butterfly perched on a yellow jessamine flower

287(g) agreements authorize local police to do the work of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). They are a threat to public safety, a disaster for civil liberties, and a financial burden on local governments.

Immigrants are entitled to certain broad constitutional protections.

Due Process: The right to be treated fairly, whether in a deportation hearing or a criminal court proceeding, applies to every person within U.S. borders.

Equal Protection: Prohibits discrimination based on race or national origin.

Free Speech and Religious Freedom: These rights are protected under the First Amendment.

See our Know Your Rights: Immigration page for more details.

Know Your Rights: Immigration

The Latest


News & Commentary
Photo collage including officers arresting somebody and the fence of a detention center with barbed wire.

Control Migratorio en Carolina del Sur: Qué necesita saber

El ICE y la policía local están colaborando en todo el estado. Prepárese, conozca sus derechos.
News & Commentary
Collage of police wearing riot masks

5 ugly facts about ICE collaboration in South Carolina

Local police are surrendering local control, jeopardizing their budgets, and harming public trust by partnering with ICE
Publication | Other
Placeholder image

Deputized for Disaster

Deputized for Disaster details how the Trump administration is drastically expanding the federal 287(g) program to transform state and local law enforcement into a national deportation policing force — fueling racial profiling, civil rights violations, and widespread fear in communities across the country. The report examines the impact of 287(g) agreements in nearly two dozen states and finds that the Trump administration’s misuse of the 287(g) program has extended Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) reach into everyday policing. As a result, local officers are being used to carry out “show me your papers” immigration enforcement — often during routine traffic stops — eroding constitutional protections, undermining public safety, and diverting limited local resources away from core law enforcement responsibilities. These actions reflect a broader pattern of abusive and unconstitutional immigration practices by ICE, Border Patrol, and their partner agencies playing out nationwide. For additional information about the 287(g) program and its spread in South Carolina, visit aclusc.org/287g
News & Commentary
South Carolina Statehouse dome tinted blue and yellow

Statehouse Dispatch: Session in Review

We stopped some of the worst bills in their tracks. The work isn’t finished.

Cases, Campaigns & Legislation


Court Case
Jan 7, 2026

SC Public Interest Foundation v. McMaster

Twice in 2025, at the request of President Donald Trump, South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster ordered hundreds of South Carolina National Guard members to deploy to Washington D.C. While the president claimed the purpose of his request was “to address the epidemic of crime in our Nation’s capital,” the facts did not bear that out. Violent crime was at a 30-year low in the District of Columbia. During the second deployment, which was launched in December 2025 and estimated to last 90 days, Navy veteran James Weninger and the South Carolina Public Interest Foundation (SCPIF) filed a lawsuit asking the State Supreme Court to stop the deployment and bring the troops home from this blatant act of political theater. The ACLU of South Carolina and Democracy Forward represent the plaintiffs in this case.
Court Case
Apr 18, 2025

Ariwoola v. Noem

An international Ph.D. student at the University of South Carolina faces the threat of arrest and deportation as the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has suddenly and unilaterally terminated his F-1 student status. We’re suing to defend his due process rights.
Court Case
Mar 20, 2017

United States v. Kolsuz

Court Case
Oct 12, 2011

United States V. South Carolina